1. E. J. Cockayne, P. A. Dreyer, S. M. Hedetniemi, Roman Domination in Graphs, Discrete Math., 78, (2004), 11-22. [
DOI:10.1016/j.disc.2003.06.004]
2. T. W. Haynes, S. T. Hedetniemi, P. J. Slater, (Eds), Domination in Graphs; Advanced Topics, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1998.
3. T. W. Haynes, S. T. Hedetniemi, P. J. Slater, (Eds), Fundamentals of Domination in Graphs, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1998.
4. S. T. Hedetniemi, M. A. Henning, Defending the Roman Empire - A New Strategy, Discrete Math., 266, (2003), 239-251. [
DOI:10.1016/S0012-365X(02)00811-7]
5. M. A. Henning, A Characterization of Roman Trees, Discuss Math. Graph Theory, 22, (2002), 325-334. [
DOI:10.7151/dmgt.1178]
6. M. A. Henning, Defending the Roman Empire from Multiple Attacks, Discrete Math., 271, (2003), 101-115. [
DOI:10.1016/S0012-365X(03)00040-2]
7. C. S. Revelle, Can you Protect the Roman Empire?, John Hopkins Magazine, 2, (1997), 70.
8. P. Roushini Leely Pushpam, T. N. M. Malini Mai, Weak Roman Domination in Graphs, Discuss. Math. Graph Theory, 31, (2011), 115-128. [
DOI:10.7151/dmgt.1532]
9. P. Roushini Leely Pushpam, M. Kamalam, Efficient Weak Roman Domination in Graphs, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 101(5), (2015), 701-710. [
DOI:10.26708/IJMSC.2015.2.5.08]
10. P. Roushini Leely Pushpam, M. Kamalam, Efficient Weak Roman Domination in Myscielski Graphs, International Journal of Pure and Engg. Mathematics, 3(II), (2015), 93-100.
11. P. Roushini Leely Pushpam, S. Padmapriea, Global Roman Domination in Graphs, Discrete Applied Math., 200, (2016), 176-185. [
DOI:10.1016/j.dam.2015.07.014]
12. E. Sampath Kumar, The Global Domination Number of a Graph, J. Math. Phy. Sci., 23, (1989), 377-385.
13. I. Stewart, Defend the Roman Empire, Scientific American, 281, (1999), 136-139. [
DOI:10.1038/scientificamerican1299-136]